Evaluation is a means of collecting and providing data-driven feedback on projects to better understand what works, how to improve, and new avenues for projects. Succinctly, is the project or program doing what it intends to do?

I often work as external evaluator, meaning I am not a principal investigator (PI) and am considered "outside" of the project or program.

Some information to get sense of what I've worked on for external evaluation:​

  • Areas: undergraduate student experiences, faculty development, course transformation. Equity and inclusion, as well as sustainability (i.e., whether a project can continue after the grant ends), are very much part of these areas.

  • Settings: classrooms, departments, workshops, conferences, and online.

  • Methods: Surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations. The evaluation questions largely determine which method(s) I use.

I do both summative (i.e., examining the project at its end) and formative (i.e., periodic feedback throughout the project's timespan) evaluation.

Some projects (past and present) I've an evaluator on include:

  • The Partnership for the Integration of Computation in Undergraduate Physics (PICUP)

  • Iowa State University Engaged to Excel HHMI project

  • Boston University's VIPER project that entailed the creation of HTML5 simulations for physics classes

  • Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis's Normalizing Computation in Undergraduate Physics project

  • Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) Fellows program for physicists to work on designing and facilitating a workshop on critical conversations regarding EDI.

If you are interested in hiring me to serve as an evaluator, feel free to reach out.